Dispensation That Shames Their Pride Again and Again
journal article
African Studies Review
, pp. 121-142 (22 pages)
Published By: Cambridge University Press
https://www. jstor .org/stable/41304797
Based on an original dataset of university students, this article investigates Ghanaian collective memories of past events that are sources of national pride or shame. On average, young elite Ghanaians express more pride than shame in their national history, and they report shame mostly over actions that caused some physical, material, or symbolic harm. Such actions include not only historic events and the actions of national leaders, but also mundane social practices of average Ghanaians. Respondents also report more "active" than "receptive" shame; that is, they are more ashamed of events or practices that caused harm to others and less ashamed about events in which they were the "victims." We advance the idea of a standard of "reasonableness" that Ghanaians apply in their evaluation of events, behaviors, or circumstances: they apply contemporary standards of morality to past events, but they temper their judgment based on considerations of whether past actions were "reasonable" given the power and material imbalances at that time. Ghanaian students identify strongly with both national and pan-African identities, and they frequently evoke their international image to judge a national event as either honorable or shameful. Ethnicity can be one factor in an individual's judgment of precolonial events, whereas political party affiliation is the stronger predictor of attitudes toward postindependence events. En se basant sur des archives originales rassemblées par un corps étudiant, cet article enquête sur la mémoire collective ghanéenne d'événements passés qui sont source soit de fierté soit de honte pour la nation. On découvre que en moyenne, les jeunes Ghanéens expriment plus de fierté que de honte en ce qui concerne leur histoire nationale, et qu'ils éprouvent plus de honte pour les événements qu'ils ont provoqués que pour les événements dont ils ont été victimes. Nous soutenons l'idée que les Ghanéens appliquent à leur jugement du passé un standard rationnel calqué sur des standards contemporains de moralité, mais que leur évaluation est biaisée par des considérations liées au pouvoir et aux inégalités matérielles actuels. Les étudiants Ghanéens s'identifient fortement aux identités nationales et panafricaines, et ils évoquent souvent une image internationale pour juger un événement national comme honorable ou honteux. L'ethnicité peut être un facteur dans le jugement individuel d'événements précoloniaux, tandis que l'affiliation à un parti est le facteur le plus déterminant dans l'évaluation d'événements ayant eu lieu après l'indépendance. Enfin, nous avons découvert que la jeunesse Ghanéenne ressentait des sentiments de fierté ou de honte non seulement envers des dirigeants nationaux et des événements historiques, mais également envers les comportements du peuple ghanéen lui-même.
African Studies Review, a multi-disciplinary scholarly journal, publishes original research and analyses of Africa and book reviews three times annually. It encourages scholarly debates across disciplines. The editing of the African Studies Review is supported by Five Colleges, Inc., a consortium representing Amherst College, Hampshire College, Mount Holyoke College, Smith College, and the University of Massachusetts.
Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world's leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries. Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
African Studies Review © 2011 Cambridge University Press
Source: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41304797
0 Response to "Dispensation That Shames Their Pride Again and Again"
Post a Comment